Cardinal Law’s Action in Resolving Oxymoron
September 2, 1993
Below is a beautifully crafted letter from the Cardinal. While Cardinal Law was actually promoting sex education in the Archdiocese through his staff; in hindsight, his letters to me appear to be a smoke-screen. Note the highlighted words. The Cardinal asks for a “deeper investigation.”
Mrs. Alice Grayson
1705 Emerson Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55403
Dear Alice Ann:
In February of this year, you sent me a voluminous report detailing the various kinds of materials in sexual education courses that you found problematic. At that time, I thanked you and indicated that I would give the report to Monsignor Murphy so he might look at it in greater detail. Monsignor Murphy informs me that he told you that he would look at it over the summer, which he has done.
The issues which you raise and the material that you bring to the fore are all very serious and deserve the attention which we are giving them. I intend to have a longer and deeper investigation of several of these matters by those who have the responsibility for education here in the Archdiocese. To my mind, it is very important that they come to grips with the points which you bring forth in your study.
In saying this, I want to express to you two things. First, to assure you of the seriousness with which the Archdiocese will continue and deepen its reflection on these issues with an aim at rectifying anything which needs to be rectified and second to express you you my appreciation for the determined and consistent way that you have approached this matter.
Assuring you of my prayers, I am
Sincerely in Christ,
Bernard Cardinal Law
Archbishop of Boston
Table of Contents
- Oxymoron Introduction: Crocodile Tears – Are the Bishops Really Sorry
- Summary of Church Teachings in Oxymoron
- Oxymoron Critiques Submitted to Cardinal Law
- The Complete Letters of Alice Grayson to Cardinal Law
- First Review by Alice Grayson to Cardinal Law
- July 1989 – Cardinal Gagnon calls the “New Creation Series” morally offensive.
- August 1989 – I Request Help from Cardinal Ratzinger
- Fall 1990 – Asking for Help Again
- 1988 – My review of “Understanding of Sex and Sexuality” by Alice A. Grayson
- February 1991 – Address to the Belmont School Committee
- Winter 1990 – Spring 1991, Critique of Sex Education Guidelines
- June 24, 1991 – Comprehensive Letter to Cardinal Law
- Spring 1991 – Letters to Rome, Copies to Cardinal Law
- July 12, 1991 – Cardinal Law replies to my letter of June 24th and promises action.
- August 12, 1991 – Cardinal Law’s action
- September 11, 1991 – I felt betrayed by Monsignor Murphy
- December 6, 1991 – Monsignor Murphy washes his hands.
- January 1992 – The buck stops here!
- January 24, 1992 – I submitted an alternative suggestion to Cardinal
- January 30, 1992 – More Baloney
- February 4, 1992 – Cardinal Law must have felt uneasy.
- Spring 1992 – An abbreviated Answer
- Spring 1992 – The mysterious letter of Bishop Riley
- Spring 1992 – James Likoudis
- February 1993 – Catholic Classroom Sex Education is an Oxymoron
- March 9, 1993 – The Archdioscean Newspaper
- April 7, 1992 – My second letter to The Pilot
- April 7, 1993 – No! No! No!
- September 2, 1993 – Cardinal Law’s Action in Resolving Oxymoron
- September 27, 1993 – Murphy
- March 8, 1994 – Cardinal Law’s Reply to Oxymoron
- May 4, 1994 – My Challenge to Cardinal Law
- May 4, 1994 – An analysis of Cardinal Law’s Response
- May 4, 1994 – Complaint to Pope John Paul II.
- August 1994 – Dr. Gerald Benitz writes to Cardinal Law
- August 24, 1994 – Msgr. William Murphy, Vicar General of the Boston Archdiocese
- February 23, 1995 – Observation of the persistence in sex education
- March 14, 1995 – Monsignor Murphy asks me to quit writing the Archdiocese
- April 4, 1995 – I quit writing the Archdiocese
- 1998 – The last communication with Cardinal Law
- June 27, 2004 – The current battle for the children